<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E Text Editor &#8211; Best Text Editor on Windows for Your Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliesoft.com/2007/09/e-text-editor-best-text-editor-on-windows-for-your-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliesoft.com/2007/09/e-text-editor-best-text-editor-on-windows-for-your-money/</link>
	<description>solve niche problems, make users happy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:54:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jonchase</title>
		<link>http://www.juliesoft.com/2007/09/e-text-editor-best-text-editor-on-windows-for-your-money/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>jonchase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliesoftllc.virtual.vps-host.net/juliesoft/blog/jon/?p=40#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I actually should post a follow up to this, but after using E longer, I&#039;ve decided it&#039;s not the greatest thing since sliced bread (although it is still pretty good).  It&#039;s kind of a memory hog and can slow down sometimes, and I wish there were more shortcut keys by default (I hate having to create all the mappings myself).  Now that I&#039;ve come to understand E&#039;s strengths and weaknesses more, I find myself splitting text editing between E and UltraEdit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually should post a follow up to this, but after using E longer, I&#8217;ve decided it&#8217;s not the greatest thing since sliced bread (although it is still pretty good).  It&#8217;s kind of a memory hog and can slow down sometimes, and I wish there were more shortcut keys by default (I hate having to create all the mappings myself).  Now that I&#8217;ve come to understand E&#8217;s strengths and weaknesses more, I find myself splitting text editing between E and UltraEdit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gyurisc</title>
		<link>http://www.juliesoft.com/2007/09/e-text-editor-best-text-editor-on-windows-for-your-money/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>gyurisc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliesoftllc.virtual.vps-host.net/juliesoft/blog/jon/?p=40#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I liked a lot E - editor when I tried last time. It is very similar to Textmate, which is a really good text editor on OS X. It even reuses textmate&#039;s bundles - brilliant idea. At the end I decided to purchase textmate, but I guess I will go ahead and purchase e for windows editing, because sometimes launching VS.NET for editing small files is just an overkill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked a lot E &#8211; editor when I tried last time. It is very similar to Textmate, which is a really good text editor on OS X. It even reuses textmate&#8217;s bundles &#8211; brilliant idea. At the end I decided to purchase textmate, but I guess I will go ahead and purchase e for windows editing, because sometimes launching VS.NET for editing small files is just an overkill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->